USPTO serial 76602477
O W
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with O W?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Kashman
DAVID S KASHMAN GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Publications, business card, membership ID cards, letterheads, envelopes, archive reprints, newsletters, trip tickets, banners, jackets, shirts, hats, belt buckles, buttons, jars, cups, pins, pens, pencils,mainly all sale table items and advertising materials | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 041 | Education and entertainment, Preserving the railways' history, Historical excursions along remaining right a way, museum with OandW artifacts and displays, sales table items, monthly meetings with slide and movie programs, Archive center for researching railway history, Publication of the railway, annual convection and dinner, collectibles and modeling | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2006 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |