USPTO serial 76602731
JOY FM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOY FM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cary S. Tepper
CARY S TEPPER BOOTH, FRERET, IMLAY & TEPPER PC7900 WISCONSIN AVE STE 304BETHESDA, MD 20814-3628UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Radio broadcasting and radio program broadcasting of religious content | ACTIVE | May 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 24, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |