USPTO serial 76602832
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Spatz
GENE BOLMARCICH LIZ CLAIBORNE INCHQ2 7TH FL1 CLAIBORNE AVENORTH BERGEN, NJ 07047| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics; nail polish; fragrances for personal use; personal cleaning and bath products, namely, soaps, skin scrubs, shower gels, bath oils, and bubble bath; hair care products, namely, shampoo, conditioner and styling compounds in the nature of creams, lotions and gels; personal care products, namely, skin moisturizer and face and body powder; and non-medicated tanning and sun screen products, namely, creams, oils, lotions, balms and gels | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | candle holders made wholly of precious metals and candle holders made primarily of precious metals; clocks and watches; jewelry, namely, necklaces, bracelets, rings, earrings, pendants, jewelry pins and cufflinks; and pill boxes of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | luggage, sports bags, purses, handbags, backpacks, wallets, credit card cases, key cases, cosmetic cases sold empty, and umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing and clothing accessories, namely, shirts, pants, sweaters, skirts, dresses, coats, suits, neckties, belts, swimwear, underwear, bras, lingerie, socks, hosiery, sleepwear, gloves, mittens, and scarves; footwear; and headwear | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 21, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |