Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76602854?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76602854. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns GESHMAK MEANS DELICIOUS!?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76602854, the listed owner(s) include: Geshmak Foods, Inc., Geshmak Foods, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 76602854?

Serial number 76602854 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark GESHMAK MEANS DELICIOUS!. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of GESHMAK MEANS DELICIOUS!?

GESHMAK MEANS DELICIOUS! (76602854) currently shows USPTO status code 614 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover GESHMAK MEANS DELICIOUS!?

The public record lists International Classes: 029, 030, 031. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 76602854

GESHMAK MEANS DELICIOUS!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614

Filing date: Jul 19, 2004
Status date: Jul 31, 2007
Registration date: —
Examiner: RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office: PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GESHMAK MEANS DELICIOUS!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Geshmak Foods, Inc.
Monsey, NY
Other trademarks owned by Geshmak Foods, Inc.
Geshmak Foods, Inc.
Monsey, NY
Other trademarks owned by Geshmak Foods, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mitchell P. Novick, Esq.

MITCHELL P NOVICK ESQ LAW OFFICES OF MITCHELL P NOVICK66 PARK STMONTCLAIR, NJ 07042UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
029	Kosher appetizing food, namely tuna fish, egg salad, pickled herring, schmalz herring, herring in cream sauce, matjas herring, matjas herring in wine, vegetable schmaltz, potato salad, cucumber salad, health salad comprised of processed vegetables, cole slaw, hummus, sesame seed paste, Turkish salad comprised of processed vegetables, vegetarian liver, tomato dip, spinach dip, olive dip, broccoli dip, eggplant parmigiana, grilled egg plant which is commonly called "babaganush", hot pepper sauce mix, white fish salad, smoked fish salad, lox bits, lox spread, lox, baked salmon salad, vegetable tuna, pickles, pickled tomato, sauerkraut, bottled sweet peppers, salmon salami, processed lima beans, processed chick peas, and processed Spanish eggplant	ACTIVE	—
030	Cheese blintzes, cheese and fruit blintzes,cheese and caramel blintzes, fruit blintzes, potato and spinach blintzes, noodles, noodle pudding, horseradish, lasagna, vegetable lasagna, manicotti, stuffed shells, pizza bites, baked ziti, potato dumplings which are commonly called "slishkas", and mayonnaise	ACTIVE	—
031	Raw lima beans, raw chick peas and raw Spanish eggplant	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jul 13, 2007	PETD	PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED	—
Jul 10, 2007	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Jun 18, 2007	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Jun 18, 2007	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Feb 26, 2007	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2007	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2006	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Sep 1, 2006	TPEX	SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION	—
Sep 1, 2006	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Sep 1, 2006	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Aug 31, 2006	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2006	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Aug 21, 2006	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2006	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2006	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Dec 20, 2005	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Jun 9, 2005	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Jun 3, 2005	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
May 27, 2005	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
May 27, 2005	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED	—
May 27, 2005	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN	—
May 6, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Apr 29, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 29, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Mar 7, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jul 28, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—