USPTO serial 76602922
FRIDGE GALLERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRIDGE GALLERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernest D. Buff
ERNEST D. BUFF ERNEST D. BUFF & ASSOCIATES, LLC231 SOMERVILLE ROADBEDMINSTER, NJ 07921UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Refrigerator magnets comprising a magnetic photo display | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 5, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |