USPTO serial 76603063
CUSTOM CHOPPERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CUSTOM CHOPPERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pamela S. Ratliff
PAMELA S RATLIFF BAKER BOTTS LLP2001 ROSS AVE STE 600DALLAS, TX 75201-2900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BICYCLE HELMETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | BICYCLE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY-REARVIEW MIRRORS, HORNS AND REFLECTORS FOR BICYCLES; PUMPS FOR INFLATING BICYCLE TIRES; BICYCLE WHEELS, TUBES AND TIRES; GRIPS FOR BICYCLES, SEATS AND SEAT PADS FOR BICYCLES, BICYCLE RACKS FOR PARKING, CAR RACKS FOR HAULING BICYCLES; BICYCLE BRAKES, BRAKE SHOES FOR BICYCLES, KICKSTANDS FOR BICYCLES, BICYCLE CHAINS, BICYCLE PEDALS, BICYCLE TIRES, SEALER AND INFLATOR, BICYCLE BASKETS AND STREAMERS; BICYCLE WATER BOTTLES AND CAGES, BICYCLE SPOKE DECORATIONS; BICYCLE TRAINING WHEELS, BICYCLE CHILD CARRIERS; BICYCLE STROLLERS; BICYCLE CABLES, BICYCLE BRAKE KITS, BICYCLE CHAINS, BICYCLE TOOL KITS, BICYCLE REPAIR KITS, AND BICYCLE STORAGE HOOKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |