CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BEYOND THE REACH OF THE BRISTLES

USPTO serial 76603073

BEYOND THE REACH OF THE BRISTLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEYOND THE REACH OF THE BRISTLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul Im, Edward W. Goodman, Robert J. Kraus, David L. Barnes, Michael E. Marion, Jack E. Haken

Paul Im, Edward W. Goodman, Robert J. Kraus, David PHILIPS IP&SP.O. Box 3001Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510-8001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021TOOTHBRUSHESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 5, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 1, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 1, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 31, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 18, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 2, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 9, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 29, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 28, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 10, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 20, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance