USPTO serial 76603148
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
E. Falmouth, MA
EAST FALMOUTH, MA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Rigby, Jr.
ROBERT E RIGBY JR LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT E RIGBY, JR PCPMB 28639 DODGE STBEVERLY, MA 01915| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Broad Based Financial Services, namely, Banking, Bill Payment and Presentment Services, Credit Card Services, Debit Card Services, Gift Card Services, Providing Transaction Authorization and Settlement Services and Payment Processing Services, Electronic Funds Transfer, Providing on-line Stored Value Accounts in an Electronic Environment, Issuing Stored Value Cards, Electronic Cash Transactions, Providing Credit and Debit Card Data and Reports, Financial Records Management and Electronic Funds Transfer Services, Dissemination of Financial Information via a Global Computer Network, Financial Information Rendered by Computer Means of a Secure Information Computer Network and Consultation Services Regarding all of the above services | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |