Drawing for RECLAMATION MANAGING WATER IN THE WEST

USPTO serial 76603177

RECLAMATION MANAGING WATER IN THE WEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RECLAMATION MANAGING WATER IN THE WEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vanessa J. Cooper

VANESSA J COOPER THE US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR1849 C ST NW RM 6519MS 6530 - OFFICE OF THE SOLICITORWASHINGTON, DC 20240-0001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Imitation jewelry, namely, lapel pinsFEE WAIVED—
016printed instructional, educational, and teaching materials regarding hydropower production; pens, pencilsFEE WAIVED—
025clothing, namely, tee shirts, golf shirts, sweat shirts, and fleece pull-overs and capsFEE WAIVED—
035promoting public awareness of the need for water conservationFEE WAIVED—
039public utilities in the nature of water, water distribution, and electricity distributionFEE WAIVED—
040environmental remediation services, namely water treatment servicesFEE WAIVED—
041educational services, namely, conducting exhibitions and displays and interactive exhibits in the field of water conservationFEE WAIVED—
042scientific researchFEE WAIVED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2004PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2004PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance