Drawing for THE NEW YORK DOG

USPTO serial 76603286

THE NEW YORK DOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE NEW YORK DOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacy J. Grossman

CATHERINE H STOCKELL FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016magazinesACTIVENov 3, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 8, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 7, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance