USPTO serial 76603299
PROPER CHOPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROPER CHOPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Cruz, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randy A. Gregory
JERMEY CASSON PROPER CHOPPER INC1334 BROMMER ST B5SANTA CRUZ, CA 95062UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | AMPX | APPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION | — |