USPTO serial 76603323
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan C. Rose
Joel D. Voelzke Intellectual Property Law Office of Joel D. Voelzk24772 Saddle Peak RoadMalibu, CA 90265-3042UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Trapezoidal cardboard boxes for toys, games and playthings, namely, dolls, doll clothing, doll accessories, playsets, children's play cosmetics, plush toys, toy action figures and accessories therefore, action figure play environments; action skill games; toy vehicles and playsets, toy scooters, board games, card games; and athletic protective pads, namely, arm pads, knee pads, elbow pads and wrist pads for cycling, skating, snowboarding and skateboarding | ACTIVE | Jul 6, 2002 |
| 028 | Toys, games and playthings, namely, dolls, doll clothing, doll accessories, playsets, children's play cosmetics, plush toys, toy action figures and accessories therefore, action figure play environments; action skill games; toy vehicles and playsets, toy scooters, board games, card games; and athletic protective pads, namely, arm pads, knee pads, elbow pads and wrist pads for cycling, skating, snowboarding and skateboarding | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Jul 6, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |