USPTO serial 76603354
PASTASOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3877148Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 16, 2010
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PASTASOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Panorama City, CA
Panorama City, CA
Panorama City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pujie Zheng
Pujie Zheng LAW OFFICES OF PUJIE ZHENG11100 Valley Blvd., Suite 204El Monte, CA 91731-2533UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Pastas, flour, noodles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |