USPTO serial 76603456
TUFFRIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 4, 2010
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TUFFRIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New Delhi- 110 001, IN
New Delhi- 110 001, IN
New Delhi- 110 001, IN
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2017 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS NOT UPDATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |