USPTO serial 76603458
TROT VEHICLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TROT VEHICLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Irem Software Engineering Inc.
Matto-shi, Ishikawa, JP
Irem Software Engineering Inc.
Matto-shi, Ishikawa, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kaushal R. Odedra
KAUSHAL R ODEDRA WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK LLP2033 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software; computer game programs; computer game discs; computer game cartridges; electronic game software; electronic game programs; electronic game discs; electronic game cartridges; video game software; video game programs; video game discs; video game cartridges; interactive game software; interactive game programs; interactive game discs; interactive game cartridges; video game machines for use with television receivers; video circuit boards containing game programs for use with video game machines; downloadable electronic game software and programs; downloadable computer game software and programs; downloadable video game software and programs; downloadable interactive game software and programs; audio-visual recordings in the form of discs and cartridges featuring music; sound recordings in the form of discs and cartridges featuring music | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 3, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |