Drawing for NEST NATURAL ELEMENTS SELECTED THOUGHTFULLY

USPTO serial 76603920

NEST NATURAL ELEMENTS SELECTED THOUGHTFULLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEST NATURAL ELEMENTS SELECTED THOUGHTFULLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ned T. Himmelrich

NED T HIMMELRICH GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER233 E REDWOOD STBALTIMORE, MD 21202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of othersACTIVEOct 15, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 12, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 12, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 7, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 7, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 2, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 31, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 1, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 27, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 3, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 19, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 13, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 7, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance