CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CAPTION

USPTO serial 76603943

CAPTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAPTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Spatz

GENE BOLMARCICH LIZ CLAIBORNE INCHQ2 7TH FL1 CLAIBORNE AVENORTH BERGEN, NJ 07047

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014candle holders made wholly or primarily of precious metals; clocks and watches; jewelry, namely, necklaces, bracelets, anklets, rings, earrings, pendants, jewelry pins and cufflinks; and pill boxes of precious metalACTIVE—
018luggage, sports bags, purses, handbags, backpacks, wallets, credit card cases, key cases, cosmetic cases sold empty, and umbrellasACTIVE—
025clothing and clothing accessories, namely, shirts, pants, sweaters, skirts, dresses, coats, suits, neckties, belts, swimwear, underwear, bras, lingerie, socks, hosiery, sleepwear, gloves, mittens, and scarves; footwear; and headwear, namely, hats and capsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 12, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 19, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 9, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 21, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 2, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 1, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 1, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance