USPTO serial 76603955
BENTLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BENTLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Crewe, Cheshire CW1 3PL, GB
Crewe, Cheshire CW1 3PL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian R. McGinley
BRIAN R. MCGINLEY SNR DENTON US LLP.WACKER DRIVE STATION, SEAR TOWERP.O. BOX 061080CHICAGO, IL 60606-1080Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Tobacco, smoker's articles, namely, ashtrays, cigarette and cigar holders, cigarette and cigar cases, cigar pincers, cigar and cigarette lighters, matches and match boxes; none of the aforementioned goods being made from precious metals, all of the foregoing sold exclusively by authorized dealers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 30, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |