Drawing for CATNIPLOUNGER

USPTO serial 76604027

CATNIPLOUNGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CATNIPLOUNGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael E. Dergosits

MICHAEL E DERGOSITS DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP4 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 1450SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4129UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020pet bedACTIVEJun 30, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 8, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 10, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 25, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 30, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 30, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 19, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 25, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance