Drawing for BIRACIAL BLESSINGS

USPTO serial 76604168

BIRACIAL BLESSINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIRACIAL BLESSINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Henry M. Bissell

Henry M. Bissell Bissell Law Office6321 Riggs PlaceLos Angeles, CA 90045UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter and paper goods, namely children's books, children's activity books; stationery, writing paper, envelopes, notebooks, diaries, note cards, postcards; journals; note pads, notebooks, address books; comic books; cookbooks, recipe cards, posters; bookmarks, book covers; decals; heat transfers, calendars; organizers for stationery use, wedding planners, event planners; gift cards, gift wrapping paper, printed napkins, paper party favors; iron-transfers; patterns for T-shirts, sweatshirts, tank tops, shorts, sweat pants, pajamas, hats, visorsACTIVE—
026Fabric appliquesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Nov 29, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 7, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 31, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 25, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 23, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance