Drawing for PARIS HILTON

USPTO serial 76604205

PARIS HILTON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARIS HILTON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Afschineh Latifi

Afschineh Latifi Tucker & Latifi, LLPSuite 5-E160 East 84th StreetNew York, NY 10028

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper goods, namely, posters, calendars, notebooks, binders, daily organizers, memo pads, stickers, comic books, writing paper, envelopes, greeting cards, paper coasters, paper mats, newspapers for general circulation, books and magazines in the field of talent shows, photographs, postcards, trading cards, large cardboard stand-up cutouts featuring photographs or artwork, pre-paid phone debit cards without magnetic coding, trading card milk bottle caps, and personal checks; stationery; rubber stamps; decalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 10, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 27, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2008UNTDREQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN—
Aug 18, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 3, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 28, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 28, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 28, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 4, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 4, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 22, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 31, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2004CPEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Dec 9, 2004CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance