USPTO serial 76604237
INTELLIGENT COMMUNICATIONS, COMMERCE AND CONTENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLIGENT COMMUNICATIONS, COMMERCE AND CONTENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian J. Winterfeldt
BRIAN J WINTERFELDT BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL LLP601 13TH ST NW STE 1000 SWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for tracking, billing and reporting telephone calls on telecommunication networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advanced computerized database management services and billing services; information relating to subscriber data provided to local interexchange and wireless communications companies | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Debt collection and recovery; telephone calling card services; financial information provided by electronic means, namely providing wireless service carriers with an opportunity to choose a financial clearinghouse and providing financial clearinghouses with information to assist in the clearing and settlement for wireless service carriers; account based pre-pay financial services offered through a communications provider, namely, providing a payment system using cards that can store value and are replenished therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, protocol conversion services translating messages and information between various telecommunications protocols or languages; electronic communications services in the nature of transport, routing and switching of signaling message and information to and from various telecommunications switches, networks and databases; telephone voice messaging; transport of signaling messages and information for banking, credit and financial verification; transport of signaling messages and information to and from cellular switches, databases and networks; telephone communications services; wireless telephone services; prepaid wireless telephone services; electronic transmission of messages and data | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | providing electronic storage of messages and data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring billing and customer relationship management software for wireless service providers; providing data automation and collection services using proprietary software to evaluate and collect service data; data conversion of computer program data or information retrieved via proprietary software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VeriSign, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VeriSign, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTELLIGENT COMMUNICATIONS, COMMERCE AND CONTENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |