Drawing for COLGATE SAILING SCHOOL

USPTO serial 76604329

COLGATE SAILING SCHOOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - SENIOR ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLGATE SAILING SCHOOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL A. PAINTER

MICHAEL A PAINTER ISAACMAN, KAUFMAN & PAINTER8484 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 850BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211-3222UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041conducting of classes and furnishing classroom and on-water instruction in sailingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 13, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 13, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 13, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 7, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 6, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 18, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 17, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 16, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance