Drawing for BABY CENTRAL

USPTO serial 76604525

BABY CENTRAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BABY CENTRAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Becker

ROBERT W BECKER ROBERT W BECKER & ASSOCIATES707 HWY 66 E STE BTIJERAS, NM 87059UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded audio and vidoe cassettes, CDs and DVDs featuring educational and entertainment topics relating to pregnancy through age 5ACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely t-shirts, hats, scarves, cloth baby bibs, plastic baby bibs, pinafores, bathing suits, beach cover-ups, footwear, headwear, coats, jackets, infant cloth diapers, infant cloth diapers covers, jumpers, nightgowns, pajamas, robes, rainwear, leotards, unitardsACTIVE—
038Television broadcastingACTIVE—
041Production of television programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 15, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 12, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 23, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance