USPTO serial 76604679
MEMORIZE...WITHOUT MEMORIZING!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEMORIZE...WITHOUT MEMORIZING!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LANGLEY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
LANGLEY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software that generates patterns of disappearing and reappearing words to test memory, for use in the field of accelerated learning and memorization skills | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | EX1M | SOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | EX1D | SOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |