USPTO serial 76604760
EPIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3188477Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 26, 2006
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFF BROWN
GRANT R CLAYTON CLAYTON, HOWARTH & CANNON PCPO BOX 1909SANDY, UT 84091UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Tooth paste | ABANDONED | Mar 13, 2003 |
| 005 | Therapeutic gum for reducing the incidence of dental caries, therapeutic mints for reducing the incidence of dental caries, and anti-cavity mouth rinse | ABANDONED | Mar 13, 2003 |
| 030 | Chewing gum and mints | ABANDONED | Mar 13, 2003 |
| 044 | Providing information on dental care, namely information on reducing the incidence of dental caries, information on oral hygiene and information on overall oral health | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EPIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EPIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EPIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named EPIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2006 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |