Drawing for OCULUS.JAVA

USPTO serial 76604797

OCULUS.JAVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OCULUS.JAVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy P. Fraelich

TIMOTHY P FRAELICH JONES DAY901 LAKESIDE AVE E STE 2NORTH POINTCLEVELAND, OH 44114-1190

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009visualization software products for commercial and government sale that support data analysis and reportingACTIVE—
042computer software developmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 27, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance