USPTO serial 76604917
ULTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3310244Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2007
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ULTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Port Washington, NY
Miami, FL
Port Washington, NY
Port Washington, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stefan V. Stein
Claudia S. Valera STREAK PRODUCTS INC.11 HARBOR PARK AVENUEPORT WASHINGTON, NY 11050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Retractab1e computer cables; digital camera batteries; camera battery rechargers; notebook computer batteries; computer cables; audio gaming speakers; surround sound systems consisting of amplifiers and speakers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Systemax, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by STREAK PRODUCTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Systemax, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Systemax, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ULTRA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 16, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |