Drawing for TWOTWELVE

USPTO serial 76605070

TWOTWELVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TWOTWELVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward D. Lanquist, Jr.

EDWARD D LANQUIST JR WADDEY & PATTERSON PC1600 DIVISION ST STE 500NASHVILLE, TN 37203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Kitchen electrics, namely, food blenders, dish washing machines, food slicers, vacuum cleaners, beverage mixers as kitchen machines, power-operated coffee grinders, electric food choppers, electric meat grinders, electric knife sharpeners, and multi-purpose high pressure washersACTIVEApr 24, 2004
008Cutlery, namely, forks, spoons, and knives, knife sharpeners and flatwareACTIVEApr 24, 2004
009Heat sealing machines for food and clothing storage intended for use by home consumers; steam ironsACTIVEApr 24, 2004
011Small appliances, namely, barbecue grills, convection ovens, gas and electric cookers, electrical ice cream makers, induction table top ranges, electric frying pans, electric grills, electric steam grills, electric hot plates, electric knives, microwave ovens, electric pressure cookers, electric roasters, electric slow cookers, electric toaster ovens, and electric toastersACTIVEApr 24, 2004
021Cookware, namely, pot racks, pots, pans, non-electric camping grills, non-electric frying pans, bowls, saute pans, multi-use pots, clam pots, Windsor pans, lasagna pans, paella pans, tea kettles, griddles, stockpots, saucepans, non-electric chicken fryers, non-electric pressure cookers, cutting boards, mops, seasonal saltshaker, bake ware, plates, drinking glasses, serving ware for serving food, serving spoons, mixing spoons, basting spoons, and rechargeable, battery-operated wine cork remover, and hand-operated coffee grindersACTIVEApr 24, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 6, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 29, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 24, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 1, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 11, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 7, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2005CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Mar 7, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance