USPTO serial 76605249
UNILEVER FOODSOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3647941Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 30, 2009
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with UNILEVER FOODSOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rotterdam, NL
Rotterdam, NL
Rotterdam, NL
ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa W. Rosaya
Lisa W. Rosaya Baker & McKenzie LLP1114 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Edible oils and fats; soups and mixes for making soups | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Tea, mayonnaise, mustard, ketchup, salad dressings, seasonings and spices; sauces and mixes for making sauces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Catering services and providing information and assistance to food and beverage providers in connection with the preparation of food and beverage products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Unilever NV
- Other trademarks owned by Unilever NV
- Other trademarks owned by Unilever NV
- Other trademarks owned by CONOPCO, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named UNILEVER FOODSOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 27, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PBIR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | PBIR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |