USPTO serial 76605332
BOWMANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOWMANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY E. CARROLL
AMY E CARROLL DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE WHICH FACILITATES AND RECORDS THE COLLECTION, DISPLAY, TRADE IN AND SETTLEMENT OF BETS THROUGH AN ELECTRONIC MARKETPLACE FOR USE IN THE FIELDS OF BETTING, GAMBLING AND GAMING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF AN ONLINE GAMBLING WEBSITE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PROVIDING ON-LINE ELECTRONIC BETTING, GAMBLING AND GAMING ACTIVITIES AND FOR MANAGING PAYMENT FACILITIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ELECTRONIC GAMES; GAMING MACHINES; GAMBLING MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, THE PROVISION OF TRUSTED THIRD-PARTY STAKE HOLDING FACILITIES, THE PROVISION OF LODGEMENT AND WITHDRAWAL SERVICES FOR PAYMENTS USING CREDIT CARDS, DEBIT CARDS, CHEQUES AND ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFERS; BETTING SERVICES, NAMELY, THE PROVISION OF A BET BROKERING SERVICES THAT ALLOWS PERSONS TO WAGER ON THE OUTCOME OF AN EVENT THROUGH A BROKER | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | BETTING SERVICES; ON-LINE BETTING SERVICES; TELEPHONE BETTING SERVICES; PROVIDING OFF-TRACK BETTING FACILITIES; PROVIDING ON-LINE BETTING, GAMBLING AND GAMING SERVICES FEATURING ON-LINE ELECTRONIC PAYMENT TRANSACTION SERVICES; PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT SPORTS AND SPORTS EVENTS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, PAGER, RADIO, TELEVISION AND TELEPHONE; PROVIDING ODDS ANALYSIS AND INFORMATION USED FOR GAMBLING VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILE, PAGER, RADIO, TELEVISION AND TELEPHONE; LOTTERY SERVICES; CASINO SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |