USPTO serial 76605351
TRIOLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRIOLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa-ken, JP
Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa-ken, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Halsey
ALEXANDER H BUTTERMAN STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER DATA STORAGE HARDWARE, COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER SERVERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR STORAGE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN COMPREHENSIVE DATA PROTECTION SOLUTION, SUCH AS DATA BACKUP AND RESTORATION, AUTOMATIC REMOTE DATA STORAGE OVER INTERNET NETWORK, AND NETWORK ATTACHED STORAGE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE ALLOWING NETWORK TRANSACTION PROCESSING AND INTERCONNECTIVTY WITH VARIOUS GLOBAL AND LOCAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR MANAGING, OPERATING AND MONITORING DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; INSTALLATION AND SET UP OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MAINTENANCE AND UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; REMOTE CONTROLLING AND SUPERVISING OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS OF OTHERS FOR TECHNICAL PURPOSES AND PROVIDING BACK-UP COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; CONSULTANT SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; PROVIDING INFORMATION REGARDING THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; RENTAL AND LEASING OF COMPUTERS, SERVERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER SOFTWARE FOR IT INFRASTRUCTURE; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ENCRYPTION OF DATA FOR COMPUTERS AND DATA CONVERSION OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND DATA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |