Drawing for IDEAL

USPTO serial 76605563

IDEAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IDEAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Kendall

JOHN S KENDALL DAVIS & KENDALL PC27 W WACKER DR STE 2200CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Preparations for the care, treatment and grooming of hair and scalp, namely, shampoo, scalp and hair conditioners, hair spray, hair styling spray, after shave gel, after shave lotions, styling gel, shower gel, deodorant soap, deodorant, antiperspirant, gels and lotions, body lotion, bump control, disposable douche, feminine hygiene products, and body washACTIVE—
025clothing, namely cloth diapers, disposable diapers, cloth pads, feminine pads, disposable pads, T-shirts, sweatshirts, tank tops, jackets, hats, shorts, pants, shoes, socks, jogging suits, sweat suits, polo shirts, sweat pants, underwear, swim wear, coats, leather coats, bandannas, sweat bands, boots, gym shoes, tennis shoes, aerobic shoes, and walking shoesACTIVE—
035retail outlet stores in the field of cosmetics, toiletries and clothing, and on-line retail outlet stores in the field of cosmetics, toiletries and clothingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 30, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 19, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance