Drawing for XECUTE

USPTO serial 76605707

XECUTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XECUTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles C. Valauskas

CHARLES C VALAUSKAS BANIAK PINE & GANNON150 N WACKER DR STE 1200CHICAGO, IL 60606-1606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Securities trading and investing services for retail customers via the internet not specifically dedicated to financial trading services in the field of US government and federal agency securitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 23, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 22, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 21, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 25, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Oct 25, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 28, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 27, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance