USPTO serial 76605731
KICKS 4 CHICKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KICKS 4 CHICKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chesapeake Beach, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Samuel J. DeBlasis, II
SAMUEL J DEBLASIS II DECARO, DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHERPO BOX 40LANHAM, MD 20703-0040UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, hats, athletic footwear, athletic uniforms, baseball caps, beach shoes, boxer shorts, capri pants, caps, coats, crop tops, dresses, fleece pullovers, footwear, gloves, hoodies, jackets, jerseys, jogging suits, knit shirts, leggings, mittens, pants, polo shirts, pullovers, sandals, scarves, shirts, shoes, skirts, skorts, sleepwear, socks, sports bras, sport shirts, sweat bands, sweat pants, sweat shirts, sweaters, tank tops, turtlenecks,T-shirts, uniforms, visors, wrist bands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |