USPTO serial 76605882
LEGGIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEGGIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shibuya-Ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S. Bicks
MARK S BICKS ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO & GOODMAN1300 19TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-1649UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS AND TOILETRIES, NAMELY PERFUMERY, ESSENTIAL OILS, HAIR LOTIONS, COSMETIC SOAPS, CLEANING CREAM, MILK LOTION, FACIAL PACK, FACE LOTION, FRESHENER, SPOT CREAM, MOISTURE CREAM, MASSAGE CREAM, FOUNDATION (IN POWDER, CREAM AND LIQUID INCLUDING SPRAY TYPE), MASCARA, MAKEUP BASE, EYE LINER, EYE SHADOW, EYE BROW PENCILS AND COMPACTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | VANITY CASES, COSMETIC BRUSHES, SPONGE PUFFS AND LIP BRUSHES | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | SOCKS, STOCKING, SWEATABSORBENT STOCKING, HEELPIECES FOR STOCKING, BOOTS AND SHOES AND OTHER FOOTWEAR INCLUDING FOR SPORTS, TIGHTS, SPATS, MUFFS AND LEG WARMERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COSMETICS, NAMELY INSTRUCTION SERVICES, EDUCATION AND TRAINING ADVICE, TEACHING AND PRACTICAL TRAINING (DEMONSTRATION) AND VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING OF SEMINARS, SYMPOSIUMS AND WORKSHOPS (TRAINING) IN THE FIELD OF COSMETICS; ORGANIZING COMPETITIONS IN THE FIELD OF COSMETICS; PUBLICATION (INCLUDING RENTAL) OF BOOKS AND TEXTS, MAKING, EDITING AND DUBBING, SALE AND RENTAL OF VIDEOTAPES, DISCS, FILMS AND OTHER MEDIA IN THE FIELD OF COSMETICS | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | BEAUTY SALONS, HAIRDRESSING SALONS, MANICURING, MASSAGE FOR COSMETICS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by C. C. MEDICO CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named LEGGIST
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |