CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for WE VALUE THE "TAKUMI" SPIRIT.

USPTO serial 76605887

WE VALUE THE "TAKUMI" SPIRIT.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE VALUE THE "TAKUMI" SPIRIT.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 12, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 3, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 14, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance