USPTO serial 76605960
DEFEND PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEFEND PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Norfolk, VA
Norfolk, VA
Crop Production Services, Inc.
Fresno, CA
Baileyville, IL
CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
GALESBURG, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Laubscher, Jr.
Lawrence E. Laubscher, Jr. Laubscher & Laubscher, P.C.1160 Spa RoadSuite 2BAnnapolis, MD 21403Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Chemical treatment for seeds with fungicidal properties for agricultural use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Royster-Clark Resources LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Royster-Clark Resources LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Crop Production Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Royster-Clark, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named DEFEND PLUS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |