Drawing for KABBALISTS DO IT BETTER

USPTO serial 76605979

KABBALISTS DO IT BETTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KABBALISTS DO IT BETTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter E. Nussbaum

PETER E NUSSBAUM WOLFF & SAMSON PCONE BOLAND DRWEST ORANGE, NJ 07052UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Toilet soap, non-medicated bath salts, bubble bath, perfume, toilet water, cologne, lipsticks, nail polishes, make-up creams, cleansing milk, body and face powders, skin cleansing lotions and creams, eye-liner, after shave lotion, shaving soap, personal deodorants, hair lotions, talcum powder and essential oilsACTIVE—
009CD's, DVD's, audio cassettes, videotapes featuring religion and spiritualityACTIVE—
016Series of books, magazines and newsletters featuring religion and spirituality, coloring books, mounted and unmounted photographs, posters, postcards, calendar and greeting cardsACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing seminars and courses on religion and spiritualityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 3, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 5, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 3, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 20, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 20, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 20, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 6, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 1, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 17, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 26, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 2, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 27, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance