USPTO serial 76606196
TRIPLE CREEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3418843Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 29, 2008
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRIPLE CREEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Granbury, TX
Granbury, TX
FORT WORTH, TX
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
FORT WORTH, TX
FORT WORTH, TX
FORT WORTH, TX
FORT WORTH, TX
FORT WORTH, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John H. Miller
JOHN H MILLER22465 E ALDER DRAURORA, CO 80016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture; frames for photos, pictures or mirrors; non-metallic clothing hooks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Equibrand Products Group LP
- Other trademarks owned by Equibrand Products Group LP
- Other trademarks owned by SOURCE BY DESIGN
- Other trademarks owned by SOURCE BY DESIGN
- Other trademarks owned by SOURCE BY DESIGN
- Other trademarks owned by SOURCE BY DESIGN
- Other trademarks owned by SOURCE BY DESIGN
- Other trademarks owned by SOURCE BY DESIGN
- Other trademarks owned by SOURCE BY DESIGN
- Other trademarks owned by SOURCE BY DESIGN
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named TRIPLE CREEK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |