USPTO serial 76606222
MIELE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIELE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Osasco-SP 06278-010, BR
JD STA FE - OSASCO - SAO PAULO, BR
JD STA FE - OSASCO - SAO PAULO, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LORA A MOFFATT
LORA A MOFFATT SALANSROCKEFELLER CTR620 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10020-2402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, foundation, face powder, bronzer, non-medicated self tanning gel, cream, lotion and spray, blush, eye shadow, eye liner, eye brow pencil, eye pencil, concealer, mascara, lip liner, lip pencil, lipstick, lip gloss, compacts, make-up kits comprised of lip gloss, bronzer, eye shadow, blush; skin care products, namely, lotion, moisturizer, skin scrub, cleanser, toner, astringent for cosmetic purposes, eye cream, make-up remover, face masque, soaps; hair care products, namely, shampoo, conditioner; perfume, colognes | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Precious metal goods, namely, bracelets, brooches, cuff-links, earrings, clip earrings, necklaces, pendants, rings, chokers, cigarette cases, tie clips, watches, soap dishes, ashtrays, belt buckles, candle holders, candlesticks, candle snuffers, candle snuffer and tray combination, coffee pots, coffee services, cruet stands for oil or vinegar, match boxes, napkin holders, napkin rings, piggy banks, potpourri dishes, letter openers, salt shakers, serving platters, serving trays, sugar bowls, tea balls, tea pots, tea services, tooth picks holders, vases all made in whole or in part of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, sweaters, cardigans, shirts, t-shirts, blouses, jackets, blazers, pullovers, coats, suits, pant suits, dresses, cocktail dresses, beaded tops, sequin tops, halter tops, tank tops, tailleurs, chemises, jumpers, skirts, mini skirts, pants, jeans, pantsuits, shorts, lingerie, underwear, bikinis, ties, neckwear, belts, gloves, socks, stockings, pantyhose, knee highs, leggings, suspenders, scarves, bodysuits, jogging suits, sweat suits, swimwear, bathing trunks, beachwear, sleepwear, bathrobes, pajamas, loungewear, infant wear, rainwear, wedding gowns, evening gowns; footwear, namely, athletic shoes, pumps, sandals, sneakers, boots, shoes; headwear, namely, hats, caps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by M5 Industria E Comercio Ltda
- Other trademarks owned by M5 INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO S/A
- Other trademarks owned by M5 INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO S/A
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MIELE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 28, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |