Drawing for UNCLE ARTHUR'S

USPTO serial 76606548

UNCLE ARTHUR'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNCLE ARTHUR'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vincent L. Ramik

VINCENT L RAMIK DILLER, RAMIK & WIGHT7345 MCWHORTER PL STE 101ANNANDALE, VA 22003-5647UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRE-RECORDED VIDEO TAPES AND DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS FEATURING CHILDREN'S STORIESACTIVE—
041Television production services and distribution of the television programs for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 29, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2007IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2007INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Sep 24, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 24, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 7, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 21, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2005CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 17, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance