USPTO serial 76606566
WEAPONS OF ASS DESTRUCTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEAPONS OF ASS DESTRUCTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna M. Vradenburgh, Gregory Piccionelli and Robert Sarno
ANNA M VRADENBURGH KOPPEL, JACOBS, PATRICK & HEYBL555 ST CHARLES DR STE 107THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91360-3984UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded videotapes and digital video discs, DVDs, in the field of adult entertainment | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2002 |
| 010 | (Based on Intent to Use) Massage devices and accessories for massaging or vibrating portions of the body; stimulation devices for aiding in sexual performance, sexual intercourse, masturbation, and sexual arousal | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | (Based on Intent to Use) Entertainment services, namely, providing photographs, motion picture clips, video clips, commentary and articles in the field of adult entertainment all on-line via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jules Jordan Video, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Jules Jordan Video, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WEAPONS OF ASS DESTRUCTION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | HSCD | HIDDEN SENSITIVE CONTENT | — |