USPTO serial 76606604
ROSIE'S PLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROSIE'S PLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vivian L. Polak
Vivian L. Polak Dewey & Leboeuf LLP1301 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10019-6093UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, namely, baby's and children's multiple activity toys, bath and bathtub toys, battery operated action toys, bendable toys, board games, cases for toy structures, cases for toy vehicles, checker sets, chess sets, children's activity tables containing manipulative toys which convert to easels, children's wire construction and art activity toys, Christmas stockings, clockwork toys of metal and plastic, collectible toy figures, construction toys, crib toys, disc toss toys, dolls and doll accessories, drawing toys, Easter egg coloring kits, electric action toys, electric toy transformers, electronic toy building blocks that light up as a night light, electronically operated and radio controlled toy motor vehicles, fantasy character toys, flying saucers, infant toys, inflatable toys, jigsaw puzzles, lever action toys, magic tricks, manipulative games, manipulative puzzles, marbles, marionette puppets, mechanical action toys, miniature toy helmets, modeled plastic figurine toys, music box toys, musical toys, paper airplanes, paper dolls, party favors in the nature of small toys, plastic character toys, play cosmetics, play figures, play houses, play mats containing infant toys, play mats for use with toy vehicles, play tunnels, plush toys, pop-up toys, positionable toy figures, printing toys, pull toys, punching toys, push toys, puzzles, ride-on toys, rubber character toys, sand toys, sandbox toys, sketching toys, soft sculpture plush toys, squeezable squeaking toys, squeeze toys, stacking toys, stuffed toy animals, stuffed toys, talking toys, tessellation or mosaic toys, tossing disc toys, toy action figures and accessories therefore, toy artificial nails, toy bake ware and cookware, toy banks, toy boxes, toy building blocks, toy butterfly nets, toy clocks and watches, toy furniture, toy gliders, toy harmonicas, toy hoop sets, toy houses, toy mail boxes, toy masks, toy model train sets, toy modeling dough, toy pianos, toy putty, toy record players, toy robots, toy rockets, toy scooters, toy sets of carpenter's tools, toy snow globes, toy vehicles, toy watches, toy wind socks, toy xylophones, trading card games, water-squirting toys, wind-up toys, and yo-yos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KIDRO PRODUCTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KIDRO PRODUCTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Lucky Charms Entertainment Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named ROSIE'S PLACE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |