USPTO serial 76606633
DRAGONFLY EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3421093Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 6, 2008
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DRAGONFLY EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richmond, BC, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia V6J 1Y6, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia V6J 1Y6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Tidman
Mark Tidman Baker Hostetler LLP1050 Connecticut Ave, N.W.Washington Square, Suite 1100Washington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video cameras, digital video input devices, namely, light sensitive devices, namely CCD and CMOS cameras, digital and analogue imaging cameras and software for computer imaging uses with said cameras, computer and video hardware, namely, light to electricity converting devises, namely, CCD and CMOS cameras, computer software for acquiring, capturing, creating, manipulating, converting, transferring, presenting and storing still and video images, and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 4, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by POINT GREY RESEARCH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by POINT GREY RESEARCH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by POINT GREY RESEARCH, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DRAGONFLY EXPRESS
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2008 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |