USPTO serial 76606643
BOEDICIA'S GOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOEDICIA'S GOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Liquid Gold Body Lotion Pty Ltd
Brisbane Queensland, AU
Liquid Gold Body Lotion Pty Ltd
Brisbane Queensland, AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfume, body lotion, hand and nail cream, facial cleanser, toner, decolletage and breast cream, bath bombs, bath milk, personal deodorant, bath and shower gel, soaps, mens fragrance, shampoo and hair conditioner, facial moisturizing cream | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |