USPTO serial 76606897
OMEGA GIRL PETZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OMEGA GIRL PETZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY M. KEATS
PAMELA S HICKS BARNES MORRIS ET AL1424 2ND STREET3RD FLSANTA MONICA, CA 90401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | HAIR ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, BOWS, CLIPS, BARRETTES AND TIES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |