USPTO serial 76607229
6.5 GRENDEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3151346Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 3, 2006
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 6.5 GRENDEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Radford, VA
Radford, VA
Radford, VA
RADFORD, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly A. Force
Kimberly A. Force Force Law Office9687 U HwyPrairie Home, MO 65068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | Rifle cases, shot shells, shell casings, cartridge dies, cartridge cases, small arms ammunition, ammunition casings, loading tools for ammunitions namely re-cappers and loading blocks | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Aug 24, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alexander Arms LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Alexander Arms LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Alexander Arms LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ALEXANDER INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Similar marks named 6.5 GRENDEL
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2012 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |