Drawing for WHITENING ACTION STRIPS

USPTO serial 76607276

WHITENING ACTION STRIPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3033692Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 27, 2005
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHITENING ACTION STRIPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. W. Reick

H. W. Reick Price, Heneveld, Cooper, DeWitt & Litton, LLP695 Kenmoor S.E.P.O. Box 2567Grand Rapids, MI 49501

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Teeth whitening films containing dental bleaching preparationsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDSep 30, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 28, 2012C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Aug 22, 2012C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Aug 22, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 22, 2012ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 16, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 1, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance