USPTO serial 76607459
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
St. Louis, MO
St. Louis, MO
ST. LOUIS, MO
ST. LOUIS, MO
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bernard W. Gerdelman
BERNARD W GERDELMAN PAULE, CAMAZINE & BLUMENTHAL PC165 N MERAMEC AVE FL 6CLAYTON, MO 63105-3772UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | vitamin and mineral supplements; over-the-counter medications, namely, aspirin, nasal spray, cough syrups, cough lozenges, epsom salts, calamine lotion, antiseptics, camphor, castor oil, hydrogen peroxide, mineral oil, and alcohols for topical use; homeopathic remedies, namely, minerals, botanicals, herbs, plant extracts, animal and inert material, latrodectus, pollens and dusts for improving brain function, for bringing muscles back into homeostasis, and for strengthening body systems namely the immune system, the digestive system, the liver, the kidneys, the circulatory system, the glandular system, the skin and the lungs | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |